SLOWING THE RISE OF POWER PRICES IS NOT ENOUGH
The price of power has been killing our industries for years.
The price of power has been killing our industries for years, while the rate of deindustrialization has been scandalously unreported by any official agency.
See the major power-intensive industries closing down, see the dwindling number of staff in small coffee shops and cafes, the rate of insolvency and arrears in mortgage payments.
We urgently need cheaper power and there is only one way to get it. New coal burners can keep the lights on with cheap and reliable power until nuclear is fully functional in a decade or three.
The Alliance for Responsible Citizenship and the Page Research Centre spelled it out in “Economic Self-Harm or a Pro-Human Future” written by Gerard Holland and Gene Tunney. https://www.arcforum.com/research-papers/choices-pro-human-future
The net zero target embraced by the major parties will inevitably wreck the economy and bring both economic and environmental ruin to our once proud, productive and prosperous nation.
In the last decade energy prices increased by some 60 percent in real terms (160% nominal) while renewables increased their share of the power mix from under 10% to more than 40%. Increasing that number won’t reduce the price of power or even emissions because all of the coal capacity will have to retained as a spinning reserve for nights when there is little or no wind.
All of the critical indicators of economic and personal wellbeing are hostages to the cost of electricity; our stagnant productivity, the declining per capita GDP, the cost of living, the inflation rate, the survival of small business and energy intensive industries which are rapidly fading away.
Meanwhile the number of public servants is growing to multiply the number and complexity of regulations that strangle productivity in the private sector.
Billions are spent on building materials including concrete and steel to bury in holes in the ground under windmills while construction lags for other kinds of essential infrastructure including houses, hospitals roads and bridges. Imagine giving houses a higher priority for resources, ahead of windmills!
None of this waste and the sacrifice of living conditions for people will make a measurable difference to the amount of CO2 in the air, or even the human contribution to it.
They chart four futures.
Starting at the bottom with the 100% renewables grid, calling for $332 billion in investment. Retail electricity prices will rise by up to 70% and there is no guarantee that it is achievable.
Number three is the current policy pathway with Investment of $261 billion. Retail prices are expected to rise by 30 to 69% while destruction of forests and farmland continues.
Number two is the technology neutral pathway or “all of the above,” including nuclear energy, with capital investment of $163 billion.
Retail prices could rise 35% in the short term with the possibility of a 4% decrease in a decade or three. Again, forests continue to be trashed while toxins in solar panels become the asbestos of the future.
Option 1 is “No net zero” with cheap and reliable power from new coal burners. Capital investment is $103 billion with retail prices potentially decreasing by 25%. Pillage of forests and farmland stops.
We urgently have to fast track a reliable and cost-effective energy supply that is not captive to the scientific illiteracy and ideological obsessions of the Greens and their fellow travellers in the major parties.
Net Zero Watch doesn't only affect power prices. It affects the cost of almost everything we deal with. Including The huge cost of subsidies for wind and solar power and the cost of building and maintaining these monstrosities..
What I can't understand is why Australia is happy to export millions of tons of coal but Flat they refuses to burn it to keep the lights on at a reasonable price.
More lies and misinformation than one generally finds in one place.